War
Who's side is the NYTimes on, anyway?
The title of their ballyhooed piece is
Adage from pre-historic times: "Follow the Money"
The Times admits that at most the legality is fuzzy vs outright illegal. They admit that the program has many safeguards in place - though not an "endtime". And they admit it's been useful. Now, will they admit that by putting it in the NYTimes it has basically unclassified a classified program and made it moot?
The title of their ballyhooed piece is
Bank Data is Sifted by U.S. in Secret to Block Terror
Adage from pre-historic times: "Follow the Money"
The Times admits that at most the legality is fuzzy vs outright illegal. They admit that the program has many safeguards in place - though not an "endtime". And they admit it's been useful. Now, will they admit that by putting it in the NYTimes it has basically unclassified a classified program and made it moot?